There's a moment every vibe coder hits: the initial demo works, the AI scaffolded something impressive in an afternoon, and then you realize — this thing actually needs to run. In production. With real users. And suddenly the single file, everything-in-one approach starts to feel less like speed and more like a trap.
Here's what I've learned about building agentic applications that stay maintainable as they grow.
The temptation when building with AI is to reach for the most impressive tools. Resist it.
Frontend on Vercel is fine. Seriously. Don't overthink it. Let it handle chat, auth, file uploads, and approvals — the things users actually touch. It doesn't need to know what the agent is doing internally.
Your API should be stateless. Deploy it on Cloud Run, Railway, or Fly.io using FastAPI or Node. Stateless means each request is self-contained, which makes horizontal scaling trivial and debugging a lot less painful.
Tip: If your workflow is genuinely multi-step — planning, waiting, branching — then add something like LangGraph or Temporal. Otherwise, don't introduce orchestration complexity before you need it.
This is the single biggest mistake I see in early vibe-coded systems: frontend, agent logic, memory, and business data all living together in one hidden layer.
That's what makes these systems hard to debug and even harder to trust.
A cleaner mental model looks like this:
Each layer has a single responsibility. The frontend doesn't make agent decisions. The agent doesn't write to the database directly. Tools are isolated from the core flow. Memory is explicit.
One of the sneakiest failure modes in agentic systems is implicit memory — context quietly stuffed into system prompts that nobody can see or audit.
Make memory explicit. Store it. Log it. Version it if you need to. A user should be able to look at what context the agent is working with. You should be able to inspect it when something goes wrong at 2 AM.
The same principle applies to observability — and it needs to exist from day one, not bolted on later:
Because people post about multi-agent systems constantly online, it feels like that's the default starting point. It's not.
Most early systems need one good orchestrator and a clear tool layer. Five agents talking to each other sounds powerful; in practice it usually means five places for failures to disappear and become impossible to trace.
Separate agents start to make sense when the roles are genuinely distinct — like:
If you can't clearly articulate why each agent is separate, it probably shouldn't be.
AI is excellent at:
It is not the right tool for designing your boundaries. Do that manually.
The things that need to be deliberate:
Warning: This is usually the line between a fun demo and a system you can actually run. The demo doesn't need auditability. The production system does.
Keep the edges simple, put intelligence in one deliberate place, isolate your tools, make memory explicit, and observe everything from the start.
That's it. Vibe code the boilerplate. Design the boundaries yourself. And resist the urge to add orchestration complexity before the simple version breaks.
Have a different approach? I'd love to hear how you're structuring your agentic apps — especially what's working at scale.
Burning tokens isn't a productivity metric, it's a cost center. Here's how the frugal AI shift translates into concrete architecture decisions on Salesforce projects.
Breaking down the economics of AI subscriptions to understand how AI providers can offer massive token limits without going bankrupt.
If your architecture only lives inside the Salesforce landscape, your role is shrinking. Here is why modern architects must master enterprise patterns outside the CRM sandbox.